InformedCitizen.usBeta

Bills / H.J.Res. 1

H.J.Res. 1

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine justices.

Failed
Latest action: 2026-09-02: On motion to suspend the rules and pass Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 212 - 206 (Roll no. 293).Bill on Congress.gov ↗

In plain English

This measure proposes a change to the U.S. Constitution that would require the Supreme Court to have nine justices: one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices. It would set the Court’s size in the Constitution.

Simplified by AI from the Congressional Research Service summary. Check the full text on Congress.gov.

Sponsor and status

Loading from Congress.gov…

How South Carolina voted

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass · House roll call 293 · 2026-09-02 · Roll-call record ↗

212 yea – 206 nay · 15 not votingDemocrats 1–205Independents 0–1Republicans 211–0

Who lobbied

Lobbying reports name the bills a client worked on. They don't say which side anyone took.

1 reports from 1 clients reporting $220,000 in fees and expenses. Fees cover each report's whole lobbying effort, not just this bill.

Businesses and trade groups (0)

None.

Advocacy groups and nonprofits (1)

Groupings are our label from each organization's name and industry, not its legal or tax status.

The connection table

Organizations that lobbied this bill, and money each gave South Carolina's delegates this cycle: its PAC's contributions (FEC) plus its lobbyists' reported contributions and event payments (LD‑203, group events excluded). Exact name matches only. An empty cell means no matching money was found. Under each name is that delegate’s final vote on the bill (passage or last substantive vote). Delegates who didn’t vote on it, for example because they weren’t serving, are grayed out and left out of the Total column.

None of the organizations that lobbied this bill gave money we could match to a South Carolina delegate.