InformedCitizen.usBeta

Bills / H.R. 9340

H.R. 9340

Ratepayer Protection Act

Failed
Latest action: 2026-09-30: Motion to proceed to consideration of measure withdrawn in Senate. (CR S5199)Bill on Congress.gov ↗

In plain English

The Ratepayer Protection Act would require state utility regulators and utilities not regulated by the state to consider a standard for charging certain large electricity users for needed upgrades. It would apply to data centers and similar computing sites with peak power demand of at least 100 megawatts at one site or campus. Under the standard, these customers would cover the full added cost of upgrades needed to serve them, including costs if they stop buying power. They would also have to provide funds or financial guarantees before the utility makes the upgrades.

Simplified by AI from the Congressional Research Service summary. Check the full text on Congress.gov.

Sponsor and status

Loading from Congress.gov…

How South Carolina voted

On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed · Senate roll call 254 · 2026-09-30 · Roll-call record ↗

Darline Graham (R)Lindsey Graham (R)Tim Scott (R)
YeaNot servingYea
57 yea – 43 nayDemocrats 4–41Independents 0–2Republicans 53–0

Who lobbied

Lobbying reports name the bills a client worked on. They don't say which side anyone took.

147 reports from 91 clients reporting $117,286,726 in fees and expenses. Fees cover each report's whole lobbying effort, not just this bill.

Labor unions (4)

Not classified (18)

Groupings are our label from each organization's name and industry, not its legal or tax status.

The connection table

Organizations that lobbied this bill, and money each gave South Carolina's delegates this cycle: its PAC's contributions (FEC) plus its lobbyists' reported contributions and event payments (LD‑203, group events excluded). Exact name matches only. An empty cell means no matching money was found. Under each name is that delegate’s final vote on the bill (passage or last substantive vote). Delegates who didn’t vote on it, for example because they weren’t serving, are grayed out and left out of the Total column.

OrganizationD. GrahamYeaL. GrahamNo voteT. ScottYeaJ. ClyburnYeaJ. WilsonYeaN. MaceYeaR. NormanYeaR. FryYeaS. BiggsYeaW. TimmonsYeaTotal
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION–$23,500$5,000$40,000$3,500––$15,000$11,500$16,000$91,000
ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC.––$5,000–$3,500$2,500$2,500$7,500$7,000$2,500$30,500
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)–$9,000–$7,000–––$6,500$8,000$3,000$24,500
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC.––$15,000––––$7,500––$22,500
NUCOR CORPORATION–$5,000–$5,000$2,500––$7,500$3,000–$18,000
PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION–$5,000–$10,000–––$1,500–$6,000$17,500
THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, DBA DOW––$15,000–––––––$15,000
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY–––$10,000––––––$10,000
SOUTHERN COMPANY–$5,000–$1,000–––$1,000$1,000$5,000$8,000
AMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCIATION––$5,000$3,000––––––$8,000
ENTERGY SERVICES, LLC–$4,500–$6,000–––$1,000––$7,000
AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL–––––––$2,000–$4,000$6,000
BASF CORPORATION––$5,000–––––$1,000–$6,000
K&L GATES, LLPLobbying firm for PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC–$2,000–$4,000–––$2,000––$6,000
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY–––$5,000––––––$5,000
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY–$1,000–––––––$4,500$4,500
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC.Lobbying firm for SWITCH––––$3,000––$1,000––$4,000
CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLCLobbying firm for COREWEAVE, INC., DATA CENTER COALITION–––––––$2,000$1,500–$3,500
ROLLS-ROYCE NORTH AMERICA AND ITS AFFILIATES––––$2,000–––$1,000–$3,000
EDISON INTERNATIONAL–––$2,500––––––$2,500
CATERPILLAR INC.–$5,000–––––$2,500––$2,500
TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. (TMA)–$1,000–––––$1,000$1,000$500$2,500
META PLATFORMS, INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES–––––––$1,000–$1,000$2,000
SIEMENS ENERGY, INC–––––––$2,000––$2,000
XCEL ENERGY, INC–$1,000–$1,000–––$1,000––$2,000
SBL STRATEGIES, LLCLobbying firm for FIRSTENERGY SERVICES COMPANY–––––––$1,500––$1,500
AIRPORTS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL -- NORTH AMERICA–$1,000$1,000–––––––$1,000
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA–––$1,000––––––$1,000
TIBER CREEK GROUPLobbying firm for MICROSOFT CORPORATION–$5,500–$1,000––––––$1,000
FIERCE GOVERNMENT RELATIONSLobbying firm for THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, COMCAST CORPORATION–––––––$1,000––$1,000
ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC.Lobbying firm for THE ALUMINUM ASSOCIATION–––––––$1,000––$1,000
BLOOM ENERGY–––––––$260––$260
Total–$76,500$51,000$96,500$14,500$2,500$2,500$65,760$35,000$42,500