InformedCitizen.usBeta

Bills / S.J.Res. 187

S.J.Res. 187

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Modification to the Start of the Submission Period for Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Reporting and Recordkeeping Under TSCA 8(a)(7)".

Failed
Latest action: 2026-08-05: Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 50. Record Vote Number: 222.Bill on Congress.gov ↗

In plain English

Writing a plain-English summary…

Sponsor and status

Loading from Congress.gov…

How South Carolina voted

On the Motion to Proceed · Senate roll call 222 · 2026-08-05 · Roll-call record ↗

Darline Graham (R)Lindsey Graham (R)Tim Scott (R)
NayNot servingNay
48 yea – 50 nayDemocrats 45–0Independents 2–0Republicans 1–50

Who lobbied

Lobbying reports name the bills a client worked on. They don't say which side anyone took.

4 reports from 4 clients reporting $21,000,000 in fees and expenses. Fees cover each report's whole lobbying effort, not just this bill.

Businesses and trade groups (3)

Advocacy groups and nonprofits (0)

None.

Not classified (1)

Groupings are our label from each organization's name and industry, not its legal or tax status.

The connection table

Organizations that lobbied this bill, and money each gave South Carolina's delegates this cycle: its PAC's contributions (FEC) plus its lobbyists' reported contributions and event payments (LD‑203, group events excluded). Exact name matches only. An empty cell means no matching money was found. Under each name is that delegate’s final vote on the bill (passage or last substantive vote). Delegates who didn’t vote on it, for example because they weren’t serving, are grayed out and left out of the Total column.

None of the organizations that lobbied this bill gave money we could match to a South Carolina delegate.